Re: documentation structure
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>,
"pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-03-20T21:25:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
docs: Consistently use <optional> to indicate optional parameters
- 0d829703363b 18.0 landed
-
docs: Consolidate into new "WAL for Extensions" chapter.
- 09d9800e5282 17.0 landed
-
freespace: Don't return blocks past the end of the main fork.
- 935829743151 17.0 cited
-
docs: Merge separate chapters on built-in index AMs into one.
- fe8eaa54420c 17.0 landed
-
docs: Demote "Monitoring Disk Usage" from chapter to section.
- f470b5c67924 17.0 landed
-
doc: move system views section to its own chapter
- 64d364bb39cb 16.0 cited
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 5:05 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: >> I think you can achieve this with a much smaller patch that just changes >> the outer tag in each file so that each file is a <sect1>, then create a >> single file that includes all of these plus an additional outer tag for >> the <chapter> (or maybe just add the <chapter> in postgres.sgml). This >> has the advantage that each AM continues to be a separate single file, >> and you still have your desired structure. > Right, that could also be done, and not just for 0003. I just wasn't > sure that was the right approach. It would mean that the division of > the SGML into files continues to reflect the original chapter > divisions rather than the current ones forever. In the short run > that's less churn, less back-patching pain, etc.; but in the long term > it means you've got relics of a structure that doesn't exist any more > sticking around forever. I'd say that a separate file per AM is a good thing regardless. Elsewhere in this same thread are grumblings about how big func.sgml is; why would you think it good to start down that same path for the AM documentation? regards, tom lane