Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Date: 2005-10-17T18:44:24Z
Lists: pgsql-general
Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org> writes: > tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane) writes: >> I've been trying to figure out what it is that Oracle gets out of >> this, assuming that they don't see MySQL as a serious threat to >> their core business. > [ snip ] > Of course, if the "ability to support R/3" requires InnoDB stuff, then > this means Oracle just did a nice job of cutting off this strategy... Ah-hah. *Now* it's all clear: an alternative to Oracle for SAP would definitely be a strong threat to Oracle's bottom line. I think we just found the real motivation. (BTW, has anyone looked lately to see how far away Postgres is from being able to run SAP?) regards, tom lane