Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-08-05T14:59:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
> Thanks for reviving this.  I am +1 on placing this behind PG_TEST_EXTRA as was
> discussed upthread.

+1 here too.

			regards, tom lane



Commits

  1. Hide expensive pg_upgrade test behind PG_TEST_EXTRA

  2. Set log_statement=none in t/002_pg_upgrade.pl

  3. 002_pg_upgrade.pl: Move pg_dump test code for better stability

  4. 002_pg_upgrade.pl: rename some variables for clarity

  5. Verify roundtrip dump/restore of regression database

  6. Refactor TAP test code for file comparisons into new routine in Utils.pm

  7. Virtual generated columns

  8. Put generated_stored test objects in a schema

  9. Introduce "builtin" collation provider.

  10. Revert "Improve compression and storage support with inheritance"