Re: making EXPLAIN extensible
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-03-07T17:33:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
pg_overexplain: Use PG_MODULE_MAGIC_EXT.
- 83ccc85859f3 18.0 landed
-
pg_overexplain: Call previous hooks as appropriate.
- 9f0c36aea0fb 18.0 landed
-
pg_overexplain: Additional EXPLAIN options for debugging.
- 8d5ceb113e3f 18.0 landed
-
Add an additional hook for EXPLAIN option validation.
- 50ba65e73325 18.0 landed
-
Add some new hooks so extensions can add details to EXPLAIN.
- 4fd02bf7cf94 18.0 landed
-
Make it possible for loadable modules to add EXPLAIN options.
- c65bc2e1d14a 18.0 landed
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > Here's v6, doing it that way. I found that the simplest thing to do > was just push the call to GetExplainExtensionId() inside > Get/SetExplainExtensionState(). Fair enough. > Tom, what do you think? The header comments for explain_state.c could use a spellcheck. I noticed s/offests/offsets/ and s/direcrtly/directly/. Other than that, I think 0001 and 0002 are good to go. I've still not looked at 0003. regards, tom lane