Re: Added missing invalidations for all tables publication
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>,
Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-09-11T18:28:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 7:57 AM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com > <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: >> I found that the patch cannot be applied to back-branches(v10-v14) cleanly, >> so, I generate the patches for back-branches. Attached, all the patches have >> passed regression test. > Pushed! Shouldn't the CF entry for this be closed? [1] regards, tom lane [1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/34/3311/
Commits
-
Invalidate relcache for publications defined for all tables.
- 2eb09f27db6c 12.9 landed
- ddfc7299d0a3 13.5 landed
- 8db27fbc1197 14.0 landed
- 8bd534274099 15.0 landed
- 28cde380c1c0 10.19 landed
- 96e38fa5e549 11.14 landed