Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL
tony <tony@tgds.net>
From: Tony Grant <tony@tgds.net>
To: Network Administrator <netadmin@vcsn.com>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>, Guy Fraser <guy@incentre.net>, postgres list <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-04-15T19:05:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 20:47, Network Administrator wrote: > When you say "forces upgrades" what do you mean? > > I might do things differently- I download the tarball, compile, dump and restore > my system. I've never have Postgres **not** compile on my Slackware boxes but > I've had **tons** of issues with RPM disto's (I've consulted on RedHat & > Mandrake personally) with even smaller packages things so I don't use it much. > > Seems to me you should **always** be able to compile software. I have never been able to compile (with regularity) PostgreSQL on Redhat boxes since 1997. Thank god for rpm... 1. Redhat 8 is great - if you need the new POSIX threads compile a 2.4.20 kernel 2. I tried installing debian a few times, Slackware once. I was beginning with Linux. Redhat went on the machine without a sweat. *ask me what that machine was if you dare 3. PostgreSQL runs great on lots of systems - my dev server is Mac OS X 10.2.5 and the client is redhat 8. There are tons of Linuxen there are people who compile and people who double click. Big deal... Cheers Tony Grant -- www.tgds.net Library management software toolkit, redhat linux on Sony Vaio C1XD, Dreamweaver MX with Tomcat and PostgreSQL