Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL

tony <tony@tgds.net>

From: Tony Grant <tony@tgds.net>
To: Network Administrator <netadmin@vcsn.com>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>, Guy Fraser <guy@incentre.net>, postgres list <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-04-15T19:05:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 20:47, Network Administrator wrote:
> When you say "forces upgrades" what do you mean?
> 
> I might do things differently- I download the tarball, compile, dump and restore
> my system.  I've never have Postgres **not** compile on my Slackware boxes but
> I've had **tons** of issues with RPM disto's (I've consulted on RedHat &
> Mandrake personally) with even smaller packages things so I don't use it much.
> 
> Seems to me you should **always** be able to compile software.

I have never been able to compile (with regularity) PostgreSQL on Redhat
boxes since 1997. Thank god for rpm...

1. Redhat 8 is great - if you need the new POSIX threads compile a
2.4.20 kernel

2. I tried installing debian a few times, Slackware once. I was
beginning with Linux. Redhat went on the machine without a sweat. *ask
me what that machine was if you dare

3. PostgreSQL runs great on lots of systems - my dev server is Mac OS X
10.2.5 and the client is redhat 8. There are tons of Linuxen there are
people who compile and people who double click. Big deal...

Cheers

Tony Grant
-- 
www.tgds.net Library management software toolkit, 
redhat linux on Sony Vaio C1XD, 
Dreamweaver MX with Tomcat and PostgreSQL