Re: meson: Non-feature feature options
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
To: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-03-03T09:16:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 02.03.23 11:41, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote: > I am kind of confused. I added these checks for considering other SSL > implementations in the future, for this reason I have two nested if > checks. The top one is for checking if we need to search an SSL > library and the nested one is for checking if we need to search this > specific SSL library. What do you think? I suppose that depends on how you envision integrating other SSL libraries into this logic. It's not that important right now; if the structure makes sense to you, that's fine. Please send an updated patch with the small changes that have been mentioned.
Commits
-
meson: fix openssl detection issues in 6a30027
- 727400994d5a 16.0 landed
-
meson: Make auto the default of the ssl option
- 6a3002715eca 16.0 landed