Re: drop postmaster symlink
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
From: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "Karl O. Pinc" <kop@karlpinc.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-01-08T00:33:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 1/7/23 18:38, Tom Lane wrote: > "Karl O. Pinc" <kop@karlpinc.com> writes: >> This is a review of Peter's 2 patches. I see only 1 small problem. > >> Looking at the documentation, a "postmaster" in the glossary is >> defined as the controlling process. This works; it needs to be called >> something. There is still a postmaster.pid (etc.) in the data >> directory. > >> The word "postmaster" (case insensitive) shows up 84 times in the >> documentation. I looked at all of these. > > Hmm ... I thought this patch was about getting rid of the > admittedly-obsolete installed symlink. That was my understanding too. > If it's trying to get rid of the "postmaster" terminology for our > parent process, I'm very strongly against that, either as regards to > code or documentation. +1 -- Joe Conway PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Commits
-
doc: Adjust a few more references to "postmaster"
- 17e72ec45d31 16.0 landed
-
Don't install postmaster symlink anymore
- 37e267335068 16.0 landed
-
Remove gratuitous references to postmaster program
- 81266442fbcb 16.0 landed