Horton

Re: Inaccuracy in wal_receiver_status_interval parameter description

Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: "Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com>
To: "Michael Paquier" <michael@paquier.xyz>, "Dmitriy Kuzmin" <kuzmin.db4@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2021-02-22T00:21:41Z
Lists: pgsql-docs 
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021, at 3:58 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> That's an idea.  While looking at that I found confusing that the
> sentence "Setting this parameter to zero disables status updates
> completely" was completely separate of the rest, where it sounds like
> even forced messages are disabled if the parameter value is zero, but
> I think that we should outline that this only applies to the scheduled
> replies.  Attached is what I get.  What do you think?
LGTM.


--
Euler Taveira
EDB   https://www.enterprisedb.com/

Commits

  1. doc: Improve description of wal_receiver_status_interval