Horton

Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2020-04-19T10:29:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 2020-04-13 22:33, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Maybe we're just trying to shoehorn too much information into a single
>> table.
> Yeah, back at the beginning of this exercise, Alvaro wondered aloud
> if we should go to something other than tables altogether.  I dunno
> what that'd look like though.

Yeah, after reading all this, my conclusion is also, probably tables are 
not the right solution.

A variablelist/definition list would be the next thing to try in my mind.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Commits

  1. Doc: re-re-revise markup for tables of functions.

  2. Doc: revise formatting of function/operator tables.