RE: speeding up planning with partitions
Imai, Yoshikazu <imai.yoshikazu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:10 PM, Imai, Yoshikazu wrote: > > Does that not mean that the if (parent->top_parent_relids) will always > > be false in build_dummy_partition_rel() and it'll only ever get > > rtekind == RTE_RELATION? > > At least, I checked if (parent->top_parent_relids) can be true if I > execute below SQL. > > select * from parent p1 inner join parent p2 on p1.a=p2.a where p1.id < 15; Sorry, I also made mistake. I was executed: select * from parent p1 inner join parent p2 on p1.a=p2.a where p1.a < 15; -- Yoshikazu Imai > -----Original Message----- > From: Imai, Yoshikazu [mailto:imai.yoshikazu@jp.fujitsu.com] > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2019 3:10 PM > To: 'David Rowley' <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>; Amit Langote > <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> > Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>; Alvaro Herrera > <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>; Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> > Subject: RE: speeding up planning with partitions > > Hi David, > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 4:02 PM, David Rowley wrote: > > 3. I wonder if there's a better way to handle what > > build_dummy_partition_rel() does. I see the child's relid to the > > parent's relid and makes up a fake AppendRelInfo and puts it in the > > parent's slot. What's going to happen when the parent is not the > > top-level parent? It'll already have a AppendRelInfo set. > ... > > > > select * from parent p1 inner join parent p2 on p1.a=p2.a where p1.id > > < 10; > > I think there is a mistake in the select SQL. > "p1.id < 10" doesn't prune any partition because tables are partitioned > by column "a" in your definition. Isn't it? > > > Does that not mean that the if (parent->top_parent_relids) will always > > be false in build_dummy_partition_rel() and it'll only ever get > > rtekind == RTE_RELATION? > > At least, I checked if (parent->top_parent_relids) can be true if I > execute below SQL. > > select * from parent p1 inner join parent p2 on p1.a=p2.a where p1.id > < 15; > > I couldn't check other points you mentioned, but I also think > build_dummy_partition_rel() needs more consideration because I felt it > has complicated logic when I was checking around here. > > > Amit, > I also realized there are some mistakes in the comments around this > function. > > + * build_dummy_partition_rel > + * Build a RelOptInfo and AppendRelInfo for a pruned > partition > s/and AppendRelInfo/and an AppendRelInfo/ > > + * Now we'll need a (no-op) AppendRelInfo for parent, because > we're > + * setting the dummy partition's relid to be same as the parent's. > s/a \(no-op\) AppendRelInfo/an \(no-op\) AppendRelInfo/ > > -- > Yoshikazu Imai
Commits
-
Clean up handling of constraint_exclusion and enable_partition_pruning.
- e03ff739695c 12.0 landed
- 11ea45ffec9a 11.3 landed
-
Add test case exercising formerly-unreached code in inheritance_planner.
- 8fba397f0ca7 12.0 landed
-
Speed up planning when partitions can be pruned at plan time.
- 428b260f87e8 12.0 landed
-
Avoid crash in partitionwise join planning under GEQO.
- 7ad6498fd5a6 12.0 landed
- d70c147fa217 11.3 landed
-
Avoid passing query tlist around separately from root->processed_tlist.
- 333ed246c6f3 12.0 landed
-
Build "other rels" of appendrel baserels in a separate step.
- 53bcf5e3dbea 12.0 landed
-
Get rid of duplicate child RTE for a partitioned table.
- e8d5dd6be79e 12.0 landed
-
Rearrange make_partitionedrel_pruneinfo to avoid work when we can't prune.
- 734308a22072 12.0 landed
-
Don't copy PartitionBoundInfo in set_relation_partition_info.
- c8151e642368 12.0 landed
-
Move building of child base quals out into a new function
- 80579f9bb171 12.0 landed
-
Reorganize planner code moved in b60c39759908
- d723f56872a9 12.0 landed
-
Move inheritance expansion code into its own file
- b60c39759908 12.0 landed
-
Fix inherited UPDATE/DELETE with UNION ALL subqueries.
- c03ad5602f52 9.4.0 cited
-
Rearrange planner to save the whole PlannerInfo (subroot) for a subquery.
- b3aaf9081a1a 9.2.0 cited