Re: New Object Access Type hooks

Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>

From: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Joshua Brindle <joshua.brindle@crunchydata.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>, Joe Conway <joe@crunchydata.com>
Date: 2022-04-04T18:32:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Apr 4, 2022, at 10:44 AM, Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm writing a parallel test just for this.  Will get back to you.

Ok, that experiment didn't accomplish anything, beyond refreshing my memory regarding Cluster.pm preferring sockets over ports.

—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company






Commits

  1. Update some tests in 013_crash_restart.pl.

  2. Avoid freeing objects during json aggregate finalization

  3. SQL/JSON constructors

  4. Force NO_LOCALE / UTF8 for test_oat_hooks tests

  5. Temporarily disable installcheck for test_oat_hooks module

  6. Fix new Object Access hooks test

  7. Add String object access hooks

  8. Add a test module for Object Access hooks