Re: conchuela timeouts since 2021-10-09 system upgrade
Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
To: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>,
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>,
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Date: 2021-11-15T07:19:56Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
> 14 нояб. 2021 г., в 05:09, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> написал(а): > > On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 11:47:43PM +0500, Andrey Borodin wrote: >>>> 10 нояб. 2021 г., в 09:15, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> написал(а): >>> Uh, sorry, this problem fell out of my attention somehow. I'll try to do something with 10 and 11 this or next week. >> >> I've adapted 7f580aa to functionality of REL_11 using "\if 0 = :client_id" metacommand. >> I really do not like idea of supporting background_pgbench() in older branches without counterpart in newer branches. >> But so far I didn't come up with some clever mutex idea for REL_10. > > That's a reasonable sentiment, but removing background_pgbench() isn't going > to fix 017_shm.pl. I'm not enthusiastic about any fix that repairs > src/bin/pgbench without repairing 017_shm.pl. I'm okay with skipping affected > test files on dragonfly >= 6 if you decide to cease figuring out how to make > them pass like the others do. Let's skip these tests. How this can be accomplished? Should we mute only 022_cic.pl, 023_cic_2pc.pl, and 017_shm.pl? Or everything that calls harness->finish? I've sent some diagnostics info to Thomas offlist, but I do not understand how it can be used... Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Improve contrib/amcheck's tests for CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY.
- b1f943d2aa7e 14.1 landed
- 7f580aa5d88a 15.0 landed
- 5a4b8a8a720c 13.5 landed
- 141cd0ef0b0b 12.9 landed
-
Fix minor memory leaks in pg_dump.
- 70bef494000e 15.0 cited
-
Avoid race in RelationBuildDesc() affecting CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY.
- e428699cb3be 9.6.24 landed
- db86746fd11e 10.19 landed
- 5141e471b36a 11.14 landed
- dde966efb286 14.1 landed
- 2e33b43599ad 13.5 landed
- 0869e53d3a07 12.9 landed
- fdd965d074d4 15.0 landed
-
Fix CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY for the newest prepared transactions.
- df6158139f64 11.14 landed
- 560124a37c2f 10.19 landed
- 5184932432b4 9.6.24 landed
- fe5d44a1d38f 12.9 landed
- a9d0a5409415 13.5 landed
- a5b9a0000e14 14.1 landed
- 3cd9c3b92197 15.0 landed
-
Add -w back to the flags for pg_ctl (re)start in PostgresNode
- b33259e261ae 15.0 cited
-
Fix CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY for simultaneous prepared transactions.
- 77a0e14f0b21 9.5.25 landed
- d683d6528dba 9.6.21 landed
- 179775135b41 10.16 landed
- d1ab4bf6ed2d 11.11 landed
- be843ce29737 12.6 landed
- 86a5b309c933 13.2 landed
- 8a54e12a38d1 14.0 landed