Re: proposal: a validator for configuration files
Florian G. Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>
From: Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Alexey Kluykin <alexk@commandprompt.com>, Selena Deckelmann <selena@chesnok.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-07-17T23:37:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Jul18, 2011, at 01:29 , Robert Haas wrote: > Hmm. Maybe what we need is a mechanism that allows the configuration > to be associated a loadable module, and whenever that module is > loaded, we also load the associated configuration settings. This is > probably terribly syntax, but something like: > > ALTER LOAD 'plpgsql' SET plpgsql.variable_conflict = 'whatever'; A variant of this would be to allow extensions (in the CREATE EXTENSION sense) to declare custom GUCs in their control file. Then we'd only need to load those files, which seems better than loading a shared library. We do expect people to wrap their loadable modules in extensions anyway nowadays, do we? best regards, Florian Pflug