Re: more descriptive message for process termination due to max_slot_wal_keep_size

Drouvot, Bertrand <bdrouvot@amazon.com>

From: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot@amazon.com>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Cc: <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-09-08T09:29:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 9/8/22 6:40 AM, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Wed, 7 Sep 2022 12:16:29 +0200, "Drouvot, Bertrand"<bdrouvot@amazon.com>  wrote in
>>>> LOG: terminating process 49539 to release replication slot "rep1"
>>>> because its restart_lsn 0/3038000 exceeds the limit by 15.8 MB
>>> If the distance were 1 byte, it is shown as "0.1 MB".
>> Right and I'm -1 on it, I think we should stick to the "pretty" or the
>> "bytes only" approach (my preference being the bytes only one).
> Okay. the points you brought up above are sufficient grounds for not
> doing so.  Now they are in the following format.
>
>>> LOG: terminating process 16034 to release replication slot "rep1"
>>> because its restart_lsn 0/3158000 exceeds the limit by 15368192 bytes
> Thank you for the discussion, Bertrand!

You are welcome, thanks for the patch!

It looks good to me, barring any objections i think we can mark the CF 
entry as Ready for Committer.

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services:https://aws.amazon.com

Commits

  1. Improve wording of log messages triggered by max_slot_wal_keep_size.