Re: Duplicate history file?

Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro.yamada.tf@nttcom.co.jp>

From: Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro.yamada.tf@nttcom.co.jp>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2021-06-07T07:54:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2021/06/07 16:31, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Mon, 07 Jun 2021 16:13:08 +0900, Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro.yamada.tf@nttcom.co.jp> wrote in
>> I just noticed that this thread is still tied to another thread
>> (it's not an independent thread). To fix that, it may be better to
>> create a new thread again.
> 
> Mmm. Maybe my mailer automatically inserted In-Reply-To field for the
> cited messsage.  Do we (the two of us) bother re-launching a new
> thread?


The reason I suggested it was because I thought it might be
confusing if the threads were not independent when registered in
a commitfest. If that is not a problem, then I'm fine with it as is. :-D

Regards,
Tatsuro Yamada





Commits

  1. Further refinement of stuck_on_old_timeline recovery test

  2. Adjust new test case to set wal_keep_segments.

  3. Adjust new test case to set wal_keep_size.

  4. Fix corner case failure of new standby to follow new primary.

  5. Back-port a few PostgresNode.pm methods.

  6. Allow PostgresNode.pm's backup method to accept backup_options.

  7. Add end-to-end testing of pg_basebackup's tar-format output.

  8. Allow PostgresNode.pm tests to wait for catchup

  9. Delay reading timeline history file until it's fetched from master.