Horton

Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem

Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-07-12T22:39:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 

On 07/12/2018 06:34 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Jul-12, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> I fully understand. I think this needs to go back to "Waiting on Author".
> Why?  Heikki's patch applies fine and passes the regression tests.
>


Well, I understood Claudio was going to do some more work (see 
upthread). If we're going to go with Heikki's patch then do we need to 
change the author, or add him as an author?

cheers

andew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Commits

  1. Prefetch blocks during lazy vacuum's truncation scan

  2. Explain unaccounted for space in pgstattuple.