Re: A failure in prepared_xacts test
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-05-03T12:27:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 29.04.24 07:11, Tom Lane wrote: > Up to now, we've only worried about whether tests running in parallel > within a single test suite can interact. It's quite scary to think > that the meson setup has expanded the possibility of interactions > to our entire source tree. Maybe that was a bad idea and we should > fix the meson infrastructure to not do that. I fear that otherwise, > we'll get bit regularly by very-low-probability bugs of this kind. I don't think there is anything fundamentally different in the parallelism setups of the make-based and the meson-based tests. There are just different implementation details that might affect the likely orderings and groupings.
Commits
-
Remove auth-options support from initdb
- 83ae824c87a5 17.0 landed
-
Make two-phase tests of ECPG and main suite more concurrent-proof
- 7e61e4cc7cfc 17.0 landed
-
initdb: Add options --auth-local and --auth-host
- 8a02339e9ba3 9.2.0 cited