Re: ICU for global collation

Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Daniel Verite <daniel@manitou-mail.org>
Date: 2022-03-16T14:25:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 15.03.22 18:28, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 12:58 PM Peter Eisentraut
> <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> On 14.03.22 19:57, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> 1. What will happen if I set the ICU collation to something that
>>> doesn't match the libc collation? How bad are the consequences?
>>
>> These are unrelated, so there are no consequences.
> 
> Can you please elaborate on this?

The code that is aware of ICU generally works like this:

if (locale_provider == ICU)
   result = call ICU code
else
   result = call libc code
return result

However, there is code out there, both within PostgreSQL itself and in 
extensions, that does not do that yet.  Ideally, we would eventually 
change all that over, but it's not happening now.  So we ought to 
preserve the ability to set the libc to keep that legacy code working 
for now.

This legacy code by definition doesn't know about ICU, so it doesn't 
care whether the ICU setting "matches" the libc setting or anything like 
that.  It will just do its thing depending on its own setting.

The only consequence of settings that don't match is that the different 
pieces of code behave semantically inconsistently (e.g., some routine 
thinks the data is Greek and other code thinks the data is French).  But 
that's up to the user to set correctly.  And the actual scenarios where 
you can actually do anything semantically relevant this way are very 
limited.

A second point is that the LC_CTYPE setting tells other parts of libc 
what the current encoding is.  This affects gettext for example.  So you 
need to set this to something sensible even if you don't use libc locale 
routines otherwise.

>>> 2. If I want to avoid a mismatch between the two, then I will need a
>>> way to figure out which libc collation corresponds to a given ICU
>>> collation. How do I do that?
>>
>> You can specify the same name for both.
> 
> Hmm. If every name were valid in both systems, I don't think you'd be
> proposing two fields.

Earlier versions of this patch and predecessor patches indeed had common 
fields.  But in fact the two systems accept different values if you want 
to delve into the advanced features.  But for basic usage something like 
"en_US" will work for both.



Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Add CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS while restoring changes during decoding.

  2. Improve ICU option handling in CREATE DATABASE

  3. Don't allow creation of database with ICU locale with unsupported encoding

  4. Make locale option behavior more consistent

  5. pg_dump: Dump colliculocale

  6. Remove further unwanted linker flags from perl_embed_ldflags

  7. Doc: document possible need to raise kernel's somaxconn limit.

  8. Reduce warnings with -Wshadow=compatible-local builds

  9. Remove redundant spaces in _outA_Expr() output

  10. Fix outdated --help message for postgres -f

  11. pg_upgrade: Fix version comparison for global ICU support

  12. Silence -Wmaybe-uninitialized compiler warning in dbcommands.c.

  13. Add option to use ICU as global locale provider

  14. DefineCollation() code cleanup

  15. Change collate and ctype fields to type text

  16. Call pg_newlocale_from_collation() also with default collation

  17. Use libc version as a collation version on glibc systems.

  18. Silence -Wmaybe-uninitialized compiler warnings in dbcommands.c.

  19. Make LC_COLLATE and LC_CTYPE database-level settings. Collation and