Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT.
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
From: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
To: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-10-26T01:47:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2021-10-26 at 00:07 +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote: > It feels a bit excessive to introduce a new predefined role just for > this. Perhaps this could be accomplished with a new function that > could be granted. It would be nice if the syntax could be used, since it's pretty widespread. I guess it does feel excessive to have its own predefined role, but at the same time it's hard to group a command like CHECKPOINT into a category. Maybe if we named it something like pg_performance or something we could make a larger group? Regards, Jeff Davis
Commits
-
Add pg_checkpointer predefined role for CHECKPOINT command.
- 4168a4745492 15.0 landed