Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
曾文旌 (义从) <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com>
From: 曾文旌 <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com>
To: tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Prabhat Sahu <prabhat.sahu@enterprisedb.com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, "蔡松露(子嘉)" <zijia@taobao.com>, "Cai, Le" <le.cai@alibaba-inc.com>, "萧少聪(铁庵)" <shaocong.xsc@alibaba-inc.com>
Date: 2020-03-31T04:16:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
PageAddItemExtended(): Add LP_UNUSED assertion.
- 30aaab26e521 14.0 cited
-
Remove temporary files after backend crash
- cd91de0d1795 14.0 cited
-
Fix comment in indexing.c
- 9fd2952cf492 14.0 cited
-
Fix failure to ignore leftover temp tables after a server crash.
- 6919b7e32947 9.3.0 cited
> 2020年3月27日 下午5:21,tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com> 写道: > > On 3/27/20 10:55 AM, 曾文旌 wrote: >>> Hi Wenjing, >>> This patch(gtt_v21_pg13.patch) is not applicable on PG HEAD, I hope you have prepared the patch on top of some previous commit. >>> Could you please rebase the patch which we can apply on HEAD ? >> Yes, It looks like the built-in functions are in conflict with new code. >> >> > This error message looks wrong to me- > > postgres=# reindex table concurrently t ; > ERROR: cannot create indexes on global temporary tables using concurrent mode > postgres=# > > Better message would be- > > ERROR: cannot reindex global temporary tables concurrently > I found that the local temp table automatically disables concurrency mode. so, I made some improvements, The reindex GTT behaves the same as the local temp table. Wenjing > > -- > regards,tushar > EnterpriseDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/ <https://www.enterprisedb.com/> > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company