Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash?

Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2023-11-17T22:19:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Silence warning in older versions of Valgrind

  2. Revert "Speed up tail processing when hashing aligned C strings, take two"

  3. Speed up tail processing when hashing aligned C strings, take two

  4. Teach fasthash_accum to use platform endianness for bytewise loads

  5. Add macro to disable address safety instrumentation

  6. Convert uses of hash_string_pointer to fasthash equivalent

  7. Speed up tail processing when hashing aligned C strings

  8. Add helper functions for dshash tables with string keys.

  9. Fix warnings in cpluspluscheck

  10. Further cosmetic review of hashfn_unstable.h

  11. Simplify initialization of incremental hash state

  12. Add optimized C string hashing

  13. Add inline incremental hash functions for in-memory use

  14. Make all Perl warnings fatal

On Fri, 2023-11-17 at 14:08 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> I think this would be a completely fair thing to port over - whether
> it's
> worth it I don't quite know, but I'd not be against it on principle
> or such.

Right now I don't think it offers much. I'll see if I can solve the
case-folding slowness first, and then maybe it will be measurable.

Regards,
	Jeff Davis