Thread

  1. Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres

    Peter Galbavy <peter.galbavy@knowledge.com> — 2000-07-05T15:55:13Z

    > Yes I'm sure that PHP was designed to make Postgres look bad. All
    > benchmarks are designed to make postgres look bad. All web designers
    > build everything in just that special way that makes postgres look bad,
    > and they all do it because they're inept and stupid, unlike the small
    > crowd of postgres users.
    
    I don't believe that your sarcasm is unwarranted, BUT, and this is a big but
    (just like mine :), I have found that the popularity of free software is
    sometimes iversly proportional to it's complexity. Complexity in turn
    sometimes, but not always, implies that the software has more features and
    is better thought out. There are exceptions to this, but it has proven true
    for many of the packages I have worked with.
    
    MySQL is used by Linux folks (generalising), probably because the learning
    curve is not too steep. And the otherway round for other DB + OS
    combinations.
    
    The problem I think that many folk have with printed benchmarks is the
    apples to oranges comparisons. To make the comparison look valid, you have
    to either reduce or ignore the differences of the fruit and just look at a
    limited set of values. In the case of the apples and oranges, "average
    diameter" may be valid, while "green-ness" is not. The eater of the fruit
    actually wanted to know "which tastes better".
    
    Peter