Re: The description for pg_replication_slots.restart_lsn
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2020-06-25T05:48:18Z
Lists: pgsql-docs
On 2020/06/25 10:00, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2020-Jun-17, Fujii Masao wrote: > >> The document explains that restart_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view is: >> >> The address (LSN) of oldest WAL which still might be required by >> the consumer of this slot and thus won't be automatically removed >> during checkpoints. >> >> But the latter part is not true in v13 thanks to max_slot_wal_keep_size. >> I think that we need to update it as follows. Thought? >> >> The address (LSN) of oldest WAL which still might be required by >> the consumer of this slot and thus won't be automatically removed >> during checkpoints unless this LSN gets behind more than >> max_slot_wal_keep_size from the current LSN. > > We just added the invalidated_at LSN to replication slots; while working > on the tests for that today, I was thinking that it might be useful to > display that LSN in pg_replication_slots. What do you think of the idea > of publishing the invalidated_at LSN in pg_replication_slot.restart_lsn > when the slot is invalid? I like having separate column for invalidated_at because (at least for me) it's a bit confusing to report the different meaning values in the same column depending on the state. Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
Commits
-
doc: Correct description of restart_lsn in pg_replication_slots
- 95a604eaebd1 13.0 landed
- 8f9b6d40570b 14.0 landed