Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "Vince Vielhaber" <vev@michvhf.com>
Cc: "Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>, "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org>, <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-01-13T15:47:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message----- > From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:vev@michvhf.com] > Sent: 13 January 2003 15:42 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Ross J. Reedstrom; Dan Langille; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up? > > > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: > > > > Total Hits 1339547 > > Total Files 1064536 > > Total Pages 324346 > > Total Visits 58178 > > Total KBytes 2712883 > > > > In other words, 2.7Gb in 8/9 days. > > > > I'm not sure I'd call that noise :-) > > It's irrelevant. The portal and idocs aren't being mirrored > and the question was about mirrors. It's not irrelevant. The original question was a complaint about the ads and why we have them - this shows the amount of traffic we get for a small portion of the site which can give some idea how busy other bits of the sites might get. Regards, Dave.