Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>

From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "Vince Vielhaber" <vev@michvhf.com>
Cc: "Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>, "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org>, <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-01-13T15:47:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:vev@michvhf.com] 
> Sent: 13 January 2003 15:42
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Ross J. Reedstrom; Dan Langille; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
> 
> 
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
> >
> > Total Hits 1339547
> > Total Files 1064536
> > Total Pages 324346
> > Total Visits 58178
> > Total KBytes 2712883
> >
> > In other words, 2.7Gb in 8/9 days.
> >
> > I'm not sure I'd call that noise :-)
> 
> It's irrelevant.  The portal and idocs aren't being mirrored 
> and the question was about mirrors.

It's not irrelevant. The original question was a complaint about the ads
and why we have them - this shows the amount of traffic we get for a
small portion of the site which can give some idea how busy other bits
of the sites might get.

Regards, Dave.