Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net>, "Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-11-18T08:22:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net] > Sent: 17 November 2003 23:31 > To: Josh Berkus > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? > > Josh Berkus writes: > > > Given all that, don't people think it's time to jump to 8.0? > > As has been said before, many people think that a Windows > port is the least interesting feature ever to happen to > PostgreSQL, so you're going to have to come up with better > reasons. Least interesting to many user perhaps, but lost of them seen to think that it's important for expanding our userbase: http://www.postgresql.org/survey.php?View=1&SurveyID=9 That can't be a bad thing. Regards, Dave.