Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>

From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net>, "Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-11-18T08:22:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net] 
> Sent: 17 November 2003 23:31
> To: Josh Berkus
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
> 
> Josh Berkus writes:
> 
> > Given all that, don't people think it's time to jump to 8.0?
> 
> As has been said before, many people think that a Windows 
> port is the least interesting feature ever to happen to 
> PostgreSQL, so you're going to have to come up with better 
> reasons.

Least interesting to many user perhaps, but lost of them seen to think
that it's important for expanding our userbase:
http://www.postgresql.org/survey.php?View=1&SurveyID=9

That can't be a bad thing.

Regards, Dave.