Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches
Michael Paesold <mpaesold@gmx.at>
From: "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold@gmx.at>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, "Stephen Frost" <sfrost@snowman.net>
Date: 2005-09-12T19:12:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote: > I probably should have broken down the spindelay patch into multiple > components. But it's only a small change --- could you try simplifying > the patched line > > if ((--spins % MAX_SPINS_PER_DELAY) == 0) > > to > > if (--spins == 0) > > and see how the patch does that way? I'll do tomorrow morning (CEST, i.e. in about 11 hours). Best Regards, Michael Paesold