Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes
Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>
From: Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>,
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>,
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>,
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-12-04T15:35:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- projection-autotune4.patch (text/x-patch) patch
On 30.11.2017 05:02, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On 15 September 2017 at 16:34, Konstantin Knizhnik >> <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> wrote: >> >>> Attached please find yet another version of the patch. >> Thanks. I'm reviewing it. > Two months later, this patch is still waiting for a review (you are > listed as well as a reviewer of this patch). The documentation of the > patch has conflicts, please provide a rebased version. I am moving > this patch to next CF with waiting on author as status. Attached please find new patch with resolved documentation conflict. -- Konstantin Knizhnik Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
Commits
-
Finish reverting "recheck_on_update" patch.
- 1c53c4dec398 12.0 landed