Re: MySQL has transactions
Adam Lang <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com>
From: "Adam Lang" <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com>
To:
Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-01-24T18:59:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-general
You should probably ask the MySQL people that. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marten Feldtmann" <M.Feldtmann@t-online.de> To: "David Wall" <d.wall@computer.org> Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 11:47 AM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] MySQL has transactions > > > David Wall schrieb: > > > > Now that MySQL has transaction support through Berkeley DB lib, and it's > > always had way more data types, what are the main advantages postgresql has > > over it? I don't think mysql has subselects and such, but they did add a > > master-slave replication feature as well as online reorganization (perhaps > > locks tables like vacuum?). > > > > Anybody used both of the current releases who can comment? > > > > Thanks, > > David > > Another question: now the sap-db is open and the source will be > released > this years, what is the advantage of MySQL over SPA-DB ? > > Marten