Re: MySQL has transactions

Adam Lang <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com>

From: "Adam Lang" <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com>
To:
Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-01-24T18:59:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-general
You should probably ask the MySQL people that.

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marten Feldtmann" <M.Feldtmann@t-online.de>
To: "David Wall" <d.wall@computer.org>
Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 11:47 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] MySQL has transactions


>
>
> David Wall schrieb:
> >
> > Now that MySQL has transaction support through Berkeley DB lib, and it's
> > always had way more data types, what are the main advantages postgresql
has
> > over it?  I don't think mysql has subselects and such, but they did add
a
> > master-slave replication feature as well as online reorganization
(perhaps
> > locks tables like vacuum?).
> >
> > Anybody used both of the current releases who can comment?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > David
>
>  Another question: now the sap-db is open and the source will be
> released
> this years, what is the advantage of MySQL over SPA-DB ?
>
> Marten