Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres
Peter Galbavy <peter.galbavy@knowledge.com>
From: "Peter Galbavy" <peter.galbavy@knowledge.com>
To: "Egon Schmid" <eschmid@php.net>, "Tim Perdue" <tperdue@valinux.com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers@hub.org>
Date: 2000-07-05T13:00:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
What ? sleepycat DB3 is now GPL ? That would be a change of philosophy. Peter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Egon Schmid" <eschmid@php.net> To: "Tim Perdue" <tperdue@valinux.com> Cc: <pgsql-hackers@hub.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2000 7:51 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Article on MySQL vs. Postgres Tim Perdue wrote: > > On wednesday or thursday, I'm going to be publishing my article on MySQL > vs. Postgres on PHPBuilder.com. Cool! > Features: > Postgres is undoubtedly far, far more advanced than MySQL is. Postgres > now supports foreign keys, which can help with referential integrity. > Postgres supports subselects and better support for creating tables as > the result of queries. The "transaction" support that MySQL lacks is > included in Postgres, although you'll never miss it on a website, unless > you're building something for a bank, and if you're doing that, you'll > use oracle. Since MySQL version 3.23.16 it supports transactions with sleepycats DB3 and since version 3.23.19 it is under the GPL. -Egon -- SIX Offene Systeme GmbH · Stuttgart - Berlin - New York Sielminger Straße 63 · D-70771 Leinfelden-Echterdingen Fon +49 711 9909164 · Fax +49 711 9909199 http://www.six.de PHP-Stand auf Europas grösster Linux-Messe: 'LinuxTag 2001' weitere Infos @ http://www.dynamic-webpages.de/