Re: serverless postgresql
Rick Gigger <rick@alpinenetworking.com>
From: "Rick Gigger" <rick@alpinenetworking.com>
To: "David Garamond" <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>
Cc: "Jeff Bowden" <jlb@houseofdistraction.com>, "pgsql-general" <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Date: 2004-01-15T18:11:22Z
Lists: pgsql-general
> Rick Gigger wrote: > > I have just about the same sort of needs now and concluded that postgres > > just is not suited for embedding into apps like that. > > Why not? It's not that the PostgreSQL backend is a mammoth like Oracle. > The Firebird embedded version is pretty much the same as their server, > but without network and client authentication layer. > > However, embedded usually demands that the backend be threaded. > Otherwise it will be pretty useless/very inconvenient to use in many > apps. Perhaps this is the major change that's hard to do? I should have said that postgres isn't suited for running in-proccess with the rest of your app. Or at least the developers don't think (and I guess I agree now) that it's a good idea. They could however make a library that would start up the server in multiprocess mode and run it in the background.