Thread
-
Grant all to Public & adding users
Marc Mitchell <marcm@eisolution.com> — 2002-01-10T18:38:49Z
We have existing database where several tables have GRANT ALL TO PUBLIC. However, when new users are added, they seem to get privilege problem until another GRANT ALL TO PUBLIC is issued. If this is truly the case (and we're not crazy) then each time a new user is added, new GRANTs will have to be executed. Is this correct? Is this intentional? Anyone know a work around? MM
-
Re: Grant all to Public & adding users
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2002-01-10T20:44:41Z
"Marc Mitchell" <marcm@eisolution.com> writes: > We have existing database where several tables have GRANT ALL TO PUBLIC. > However, when new users are added, they seem to get privilege problem until > another GRANT ALL TO PUBLIC is issued. If this is truly the case (and > we're not crazy) then each time a new user is added, new GRANTs will have > to be executed. Is this correct? It shouldn't behave that way, no. PUBLIC isn't an explicit list of users but an implicit "everybody" class. I suspect you have misdescribed your problem. There have been other known bugs in privilege-manipulation though. What PG version are you using? Can you give an exact example of a sequence that causes a problem? regards, tom lane
-
Re: Grant all to Public & adding users
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> — 2002-01-10T20:50:31Z
Marc Mitchell writes: > We have existing database where several tables have GRANT ALL TO PUBLIC. > However, when new users are added, they seem to get privilege problem until > another GRANT ALL TO PUBLIC is issued. I cannot reproduce this in 7.0.2 or in current, so either you are using an even older version, in which case it's highly recommended to upgrade (latest stable is 7.1.3), or you are confusing something, in which case you should show the exact statements you are issuing and explain what you wanted to happen in each case. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
-
replication
Peter T. Brown <peter@memeticsystems.com> — 2002-01-10T22:27:07Z
Hello I want to add replication capabilities to my postgresql installation. Can anyone recommend a good way (open source or otherwise) to do so? Basically, I have a web tracking application that must quickly and reliably store massive amounts of tracking data. Later, I run complex queries to analyze this tracking data. These complex queries tend to be very resource intensive, so I'd like to have them run on a separate machine altogether. I need a simple and reliable method to 'copy' any data added to the tracking database to the analysis database. Preferably, I'd be able to configure this copy process to defer to high priority queries or to be considerate of the time of day. Thanks, Peter T. Brown
-
Re: [SQL] replication
Bryan White <bryan@arcamax.com> — 2002-01-10T23:34:13Z
> I want to add replication capabilities to my postgresql installation. Can > anyone recommend a good way (open source or otherwise) to do so? > > Basically, I have a web tracking application that must quickly and reliably > store massive amounts of tracking data. Later, I run complex queries to > analyze this tracking data. These complex queries tend to be very resource > intensive, so I'd like to have them run on a separate machine altogether. I > need a simple and reliable method to 'copy' any data added to the tracking > database to the analysis database. Preferably, I'd be able to configure this > copy process to defer to high priority queries or to be considerate of the > time of day. How closely does the replicated data have to track your live data. I my installation I have an cron job that runs at 2:30am daily. It backs up the database (using pg_dump) and loads it on another machine. I can then run queries the next day on the backup machine without hurting performance on the primary. It also has the side effect of producing the backup file for saving to tape or whatever. It also veryfies daily that the backup file is not corrupt because the load would fail on the secondary machine. This is not true replication but it might serve your needs. I looked at the replication solutions for PostgreSQL a while ago and got the impression they were not ready for primetime. In may have changed since then.
-
Re: replication
David Stanaway <david@netventures.com.au> — 2002-01-10T23:35:34Z
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, January 11, 2002, at 09:27 AM, Peter T. Brown wrote: > Hello > > I want to add replication capabilities to my postgresql installation. > Can > anyone recommend a good way (open source or otherwise) to do so? I read this the other day, but haven't used it (And I suspect the document may need an update) http://techdocs.postgresql.org/techdocs/settinguprserv.php The document only describes replication between databases on one server though.. Other people here probably have more experience with rserv and can let you know what its status is. - -- Best Regards David Stanaway ================================ Technology Manager Australia's Premier Internet Broadcasters Phone: +612 9357 1699 Fax: +612 9357 1169 Web: http://www.netventures.com.au Support: support@netventures.com.au ================================ The Inspire Foundation is proudly supported by Net Ventures through the provision of streaming solutions for it's national centres. The Inspire Foundation is an Internet-based foundation that inspires young people to help themselves, get involved and get online. Please visit Inspire at http://www.inspire.org.au -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (Darwin) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iQEXAwUBPD4lSr6yIDFGeSAyFALYPQP8CuuS4pRHicYDVJSpJosJa8A9CqSxMkkd kqsMELbPUKSfMDsRSXoRtRYGOoymKqf6bPru5TbyPJHBIGGTJMRLuPRkvqVWitK1 l3zjMWmBzrrUB7rPa0WR35YQ9jVVSEP87I3z623d+vDG8VluBG6dKMKuMgGURb76 t1po5JtLpYAD/0BLlg9zUsPrwl70Z2b8ctXF3u2Xv2m8inSr+4qtqlgYLkLsrUih Lv9usaNXcIrY9of5v/PBNEAmY9DlN1fhjm0Zw6vTnzrlP/EDhWSdX7omAFGaBUi7 9XWuOVcrd7iqizmxzqsN+TGbodlGsEgmfMbJMwLY90gUx/t8d3aWQREj =EbMK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----