Re: Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.0.
Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
From: Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Vadim Mikheev <vmikheev@sectorbase.com>
Date: 2001-03-21T00:25:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > This will not be RC1 :-( > 'Ive already gotten a > couple occurrences of Lamar's failure. Well, I was at least hoping it was a problem here -- particularly since I haven't been able to reproduce it. But, since it is not a local problem, I'm glad I caught it -- on the first regression test run, no less. I've run a dozen tests since without duplication. Although, like you, Tom, I'm curious as to why it hadn't showed up before -- is the fact that this is a slow machine a factor, possibly? Although I am now much more leery of our regression suite -- this issue isn't even tested, in reality. Do we have _any_ WAL-related tests? The parallel testing is a good thing -- but I wonder what boundary conditions aren't getting tested. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11