Re: Re: List response time...

Mitch Vincent <mvincent@cablespeed.com>

From: "Mitch Vincent" <mvincent@cablespeed.com>
To: "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-08-21T21:23:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I've had great luck with Postfix as well.

-Mitch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian Lance Taylor" <ian@airs.com>
To: "Lamar Owen" <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
Cc: "Serguei Mokhov" <sa_mokho@alcor.concordia.ca>; "PostgreSQL Hackers"
<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:24 PM
Subject: [HACKERS] Re: List response time...


> Note that the postgresql.org mail server is still running sendmail.
> In my personal experience with sources.redhat.com, qmail is a much
> better choice to handle large mailing lists.  When we switched from
> sendmail to qmail, mailing list delays dropped from hours, or
> sometimes even days, to seconds.
>
> Ian
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
>