Re: VACUUM, 24/7 availability and 7.2
Mitch Vincent <mvincent@cablespeed.com>
From: "Mitch Vincent" <mvincent@cablespeed.com>
To: <wsheldah@lexmark.com>, "Ian Barwick" <SUNGLASSESbarwick@gmx.net>
Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-10-10T20:51:34Z
Lists: pgsql-general
> and vacuum takes just a very few seconds a day. I think I recall hearing on > this list of it taking a minute or three for databases several gigabytes in > size. For some sites this would be tolerable, for others it wouldn't. It depends more on user activity and number/size of indexes than over all database size from what I've seen.. In one database I have 20ish tables, some have 70,000ish records but the whole database isn't very big -- VACUUM takes a while because of the amount of UPDATE'd and DELETE'd records I have every day, and the number of indexes (lots!).... > I'm also interested to hear what the future holds for vacuum. If nothing else, > it couldn't hurt postgresql's public relations. :-) > > --Wes Sheldahl