Re: Recomended FS
Ben-Nes Michael <miki@canaan.co.il>
From: "Ben-Nes Michael" <miki@canaan.co.il>
To: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
Cc: "Nick Burrett" <nick@dsvr.net>,
"postgresql" <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-10-20T13:09:35Z
Lists: pgsql-general
----- Original Message ----- From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in> To: "Ben-Nes Michael" <miki@canaan.co.il> Cc: "Nick Burrett" <nick@dsvr.net>; "postgresql" <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 3:06 PM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Recomended FS > Ben-Nes Michael wrote: > > >>I'm saying: don't expect your DB performance to come on leaps and bounds > >>just because you changed to a different filesystem format. If you've > >>got speed problems then it might help to look elsewhere first. > >> > > > > I dont expect miracles :) > > but still i have to choose one,so why shouldnt i choose the one which best > > fit ? > > All things being equal, you should optimise your application design and database > tuning before you choose file system. > > If a thing works well for you, with a better file system it will just work > better. That's the point. > I agree, but still ill have to choose an FS, does the list have any opinion on what FS to choose ? > Shridhar > >