Re: beta testing version
Mitch Vincent <mitch@venux.net>
From: "Mitch Vincent" <mitch@venux.net>
To: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2000-11-28T18:12:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
This is one of the not-so-stomped boxes running PostgreSQL -- I've never restarted PostgreSQL on it since it was installed. 12:03pm up 122 days, 7:54, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.11, 0.09 I had some index corruption problems in 6.5.3 but since 7.0.X I haven't heard so much as a peep from any PostgreSQL backend. It's superbly stable on all my machines.. Damn good work guys. -Mitch ----- Original Message ----- From: "The Hermit Hacker" <scrappy@hub.org> To: "Hannu Krosing" <hannu@tm.ee> Cc: "xuyifeng" <jamexu@telekbird.com.cn>; <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; "Don Baccus" <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 8:53 AM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version > On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Hannu Krosing wrote: > > > xuyifeng wrote: > > > > > > > I just noticed this conversation so I have not followed all of it, > > but you seem to have strange priorities > > > > > I just want PG can be improved quickly, for me crash recover is very urgent problem, > > > > Crash avoidance is usually much more urgent, at least on production > > servers. > > Good call, but I kinda jumped to the conclusion that since PgSQL itself > isn't that crash prone, its his OS or his hardware that was the problem :0 > > >