Re: Licensing issues including another projects source code into the jdbc driver
Dave Cramer <dave@fastcrypt.com>
From: "Dave Cramer" <dave@fastcrypt.com>
To: "'Peter Eisentraut'" <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-11-05T19:59:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Umm ok, This is dissappointing; kind of defeats the purpose of being able to leverage open source code for the good of all open source projects. It isn't that big a deal, we can write our own logging package. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net] Sent: November 5, 2001 3:05 PM To: Dave Cramer Cc: 'Bruce Momjian'; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Licensing issues including another projects source code into the jdbc driver Dave Cramer writes: > I presume you are referring to the 3rd clause? What is the issue with > this clause? It would require everyone that ships a product based on the JDBC driver to mention this acknowledgement in advertisements, which is annoying and impractical. More generally, it would introduce a divergence in licensing in PostgreSQL, which should be avoided. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter