Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh
Moray McConnachie <moray.mcconnachie@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
From: "Moray McConnachie" <moray.mcconnachie@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: "'pgsql-sql@postgresql.org'" <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Date: 2000-03-01T09:48:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
----- Original Message ----- From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; 'pgsql-sql@postgresql.org' <pgsql-sql@postgreSQL.org>; PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 6:18 AM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh > > > So are we willing to field questions from people trying to use TEMP > > > tables and trying TEMP and not TEMPORARY. I realize the restriction on > > > a field called TEMP, but we don't get those very often. How many people > > > are going to guess TEMP and not TEMPORARY? > > > > Well, that's one reason to stick to a published standard. No guessing > > required since one could look it up ;) > > If you survive reading the standard. :-) If you can even *find* the standard :-> (is there an on-line source - all links I've ever seen 404ed...?)