Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh

Moray McConnachie <moray.mcconnachie@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>

From: "Moray McConnachie" <moray.mcconnachie@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: "'pgsql-sql@postgresql.org'" <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Date: 2000-03-01T09:48:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
----- Original Message -----
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; 'pgsql-sql@postgresql.org'
<pgsql-sql@postgreSQL.org>; PostgreSQL Development
<pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 6:18 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by -
returns multiplesh


> > > So are we willing to field questions from people trying to use
TEMP
> > > tables and trying TEMP and not TEMPORARY.  I realize the
restriction on
> > > a field called TEMP, but we don't get those very often.  How
many people
> > > are going to guess TEMP and not TEMPORARY?
> >
> > Well, that's one reason to stick to a published standard. No
guessing
> > required since one could look it up ;)
>
> If you survive reading the standard.  :-)

If you can even *find* the standard :->

(is there an on-line source - all links I've ever seen 404ed...?)