Re: disk performance benchmarks
Michael Paesold <mpaesold@gmx.at>
From: "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold@gmx.at>
To: "Jeffrey W. Baker" <jwbaker@acm.org>
Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Date: 2004-09-15T09:39:42Z
Lists: pgsql-performance, pgsql-general
Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: > Current issue: > > A dual 64-bit Opteron 244 machine with 8GB main memory, two 4-disk RAID5 > arrays (one for database, one for xlogs). PG's config is extremely > generous, and in isolated benchmarks it's very fast. It depends on the controller, but usually I would expect a better performance if xlogs are just on a two-disk mirror and the rest of the disks for data (6 splindles instead of 4 then). I don't think RAID5 is a benefit for xlogs. Regards, Michael Paesold > But, in reality, performance is abyssmal. There's something about what > PG does inside commits and checkpoints that sends Linux into a catatonic > state. For instance here's a snapshot of vmstat during a parallel heavy > select/insert load: ...