RE: [GENERAL] TODO list elements
Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp>
From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
To: "Vadim Mikheev" <vadim@krs.ru>
Cc: "The Hermit Hacker" <scrappy@hub.org>, <pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 1998-12-14T01:51:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org > [mailto:owner-pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org]On Behalf Of Vadim Mikheev > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 1998 6:05 PM > To: dustin sallings > Cc: The Hermit Hacker; Kaare Rasmussen; pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] TODO list elements > > > dustin sallings wrote: > > > > On Thu, 10 Dec 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > > // Vadim has already starting throwing in code for this...his plan > > // is for v6.5 release (~3months) for this to be in place... > > > > Interesting...will this help out vacuuming any? > > No. Vacuum will still exclusively lock relation. But > I'll fix vacuum to unlock pg_class (when vacuuming all tables > in database). > > And note - this will be not row level locking, but > multi-version concurrency control. > What does it mean ? LLL in 6.5 doesn't include row level locking ? Thanks. Hiroshi Inoue Inoue@tpf.co.jp