Re: [HACKERS] CORBA interface in backend?
Jeff Hoffmann <jeff@remapcorp.com>
From: "Jeff Hoffmann" <jeff@remapcorp.com>
To: <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 1998-11-11T20:43:25Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>On Wed, 11 Nov 1998, Michael Meskes wrote: > >> This is where it gets tricky. Which existing ORB are you thinking about? I >> know of only two free ORBs: The Gnome one (orbit) and mico. Orbit is GPLed >> so there's a problem with PostgreSQL becoming GPLed. However, as long as >> PostgreSQL remain free under the BSD license that should be okay. But we >> defintely lose the possibility to make this a commercial product. Not that >> we want to do so. > there's also omniORB (http://www.orl.co.uk) which i found when i was looking for vnc. haven't used it, don't know much about it, but i believe it's also LGPL'd (maybe GPL'd) > Both are GPLd then, as I'm doing work with MICO and FreeBSD, and >just checked their license files. > > Now, here is where *I* get confused. MICO uses LGPL for its >libraries, so does this mean that the ORB hooks could be added where >applicable, still under the BSD license, but in order to compile it in, >mico's libraries would have to be installed first? Its something we >check for/do with the tcl stuff... > > So, could the ORB hooks be added with a config option of >'--enable-orb' *without* the requirement for adding in any GPLd code? an abstract orb interface? sounds good as long as someone else is doing the work.