RE: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates
Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp>
From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 2000-01-21T01:44:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org > [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org]On Behalf Of Tom Lane > > I have been spending some time measuring actual runtimes for various > sequential-scan and index-scan query plans, and have learned that the > current Postgres optimizer's cost estimation equations are not very > close to reality at all. > Thanks for your good analysis. I also have said current cost estimation for index-scan is too low. But I have had no concrete numerical values. I've wondered why we cound't analyze database without vacuum. We couldn't run vacuum light-heartedly because it acquires an exclusive lock for the target table. In addition,vacuum error occurs with analyze option in most cases AFAIK. Regards. Hiroshi Inoue Inoue@tpf.co.jp