Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO)

Robert B. Easter <reaster@comptechnews.com>

From: "Robert B. Easter" <reaster@comptechnews.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2000-05-20T22:25:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 20 May 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> 
> UNDER <supertable>, <supertable>, ...

The standard is very confusing,  I am probably wrong, but I didn't see the
syntax for allowing more than one <supertable clause> after the UNDER keyword.

Did Oracle approve ANSI-ISO-9075?  I didn't notice them listed anywhere.  9075
is the SQL3 standard right?  (or else I'm reading the wrong stuff!!)  :)

 -- 
Robert B. Easter
reaster@comptechnews.com