Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO)
Robert B. Easter <reaster@comptechnews.com>
From: "Robert B. Easter" <reaster@comptechnews.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2000-05-20T22:25:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 20 May 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > UNDER <supertable>, <supertable>, ... The standard is very confusing, I am probably wrong, but I didn't see the syntax for allowing more than one <supertable clause> after the UNDER keyword. Did Oracle approve ANSI-ISO-9075? I didn't notice them listed anywhere. 9075 is the SQL3 standard right? (or else I'm reading the wrong stuff!!) :) -- Robert B. Easter reaster@comptechnews.com