RE: Big 7.1 open items

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us]
> 
> > "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> > > Now I like neither relname nor oid because it's not sufficient 
> > > for my purpose.
> > 
> > We should probably not do much of anything with this issue until
> > we have a clearer understanding of what we want to do about
> > tablespaces and schemas.
> 
> Here is an analysis of our options:
> 
>                           Work required             Disadvantages
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> 
> Keep current system       no work                   rename/create 
> no rollback
> 
> relname/oid but           less work                 new pg_class column,
> no rename change                                    filename not 
> accurate on
>                                                     rename
> 
> relname/oid with          more work                 complex code
> rename change during      
> vacuum
> 
> oid filename              less work, but            confusing to admins
>                           need admin tools          
>

Please add my opinion for naming rule.

relname/unique_id but	need some work		new pg_class column,	
no relname change.	for unique-id generation	filename not relname

Regards.

Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue@tpf.co.jp