RE: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation
Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp>
From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, "Philip Warner" <pjw@rhyme.com.au>
Date: 2000-02-15T01:00:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Tom Lane > > Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au> writes: > > Just my 0.02c, but I don't like putting limits on an optimizer. > > That's my feeling too. I'm leaning towards letting the optimizer do the > best it can with the given query (which means using OFFSET+LIMIT as the > estimated number of tuples to be fetched), What about cursors ? I heard from Jan that we could specify 'LIMIT ALL' to tell optimizer that the response to get first rows is needed. Regards. Hiroshi Inoue Inoue@tpf.co.jp