RE: [HACKERS] inlining
Stupor Genius <stuporg@erols.com>
From: "Stupor Genius" <stuporg@erols.com>
To: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: "David Gould" <dg@illustra.com>
Date: 1998-06-12T11:50:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Btw, I sure wish someone would comment on the S_LOCK analysis even if only > to tell me not to make such long posts as it wastes bandwidth. Or > was it just too long to read? I read it all! Great analysis of the situation and not a waste, IMHO. One comment...when you ran the tests in succession, could the cache be responsible for the timing groupings in the same test? Should a little program be run in between to "flush" the cache full of garbage so each real run will miss? Seem to recall a little program, in CUJ, I think, that set up a big array and then iterated over it to trash the cache. Darren aka stuporg@erols.com