Horton

RE: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS)

Moon, Insung <moon_insung_i3@lab.ntt.co.jp>

View thread
From: "Moon, Insung" <Moon_Insung_i3@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: "'Aleksander Alekseev'" <a.alekseev@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-07-03T11:18:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Revamp the WAL record format.

Dear Aleksander Alekseev.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aleksander Alekseev [mailto:a.alekseev@postgrespro.ru]
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 10:33 PM
> To: Moon, Insung
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS)
> 
> Hello Moon,
> 
> I promised to email links to the articles I mentioned during your talk on the PGCon Unconference to this thread. Here
> they are:
> 
> * http://cryptowiki.net/index.php?title=Order-preserving_encryption
> * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homomorphic_encryption
> 
> Also I realized that I was wrong regarding encryption of the indexes since they will be encrypted on the block level the
> same way the heap will be.

Sorry. I did not explain correctly in PGCon.
Yes. this idea is encrypting at the block level as you said, there is probably not a big problem with index encryption.
I will testing with PoC later an Index Encryption.

Thank you and Best regards.
Moon.


> 
> --
> Best regards,
> Aleksander Alekseev