pending patch: Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown

Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>

From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-03-30T09:09:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> HOWEVER, I do believe this is an issue we could live with for 9.0 if
>>> it's going to lead to a whole lot of additional debugging of SR.  But if
>>> it's an easy fix, it'll avoid a lot of complaints on pgsql-general.
>>
>> I think that the latter statement is right.
>
> Though we've not reached consensus on smart shutdown during
> recovery yet, I wrote the patch that changes its behavior:
> shut down the server (including the startup process and the
> walreceiver) as soon as all read-only connections have died.
> The code is also available in the 'replication' branch in
> my git repository.
>
> And, let's discuss whether something like the attached patch
> is required for v9.0 or not.

I rebased the patch to HEAD. Is the patch still required for 9.0?
If not, I'd remove the open item of the smart shutdown during
recovery.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center