Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration

Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>

From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>

To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>

Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2010-03-11T00:51:29Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> I've been playing with vacuum_defer_cleanup_age in reference to the
> query cancel problem.  It really seems to me that this is the way
> forward in terms of dealing with query cancel for normal operation
> rather than wal_standby_delay, or maybe in combination with it.

Why isn't vacuum_defer_cleanup_age listed on postgresql.conf.sample?
Though I also tried to test the effect of it, I was unable to find it
in the conf file.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center